Brendyn Fehra month agoFrom
They do not hold their "science" up to the same rigorous testing that real science must go through. Which is EXACTLY why the discovery institute doesn't get published in accredited journals. Instead they self-publish, or pay off less than credible journals.
Eric Andersona month agoFrom
I learn a lot every time I read an article or watch a debate. The critics seem more interested in confirming their bias than staying on topic. The foundation of science is inductive observation which ironically is not even coherent without assuming the uniformity of nature. You need a creator for that. This is what the Discovery Institute attempts to bring back to the forefront in science.
D La month agoFrom
Very thoughtful analysis of history, culture, and science. I’ve learned a lot, especially about refuting the “conflict” between science and religion. I could easily have become an angry atheist had it not been for them. Particularly Stephen Meyer.
