Mr. Williamson fails to abide by his own express representations. By the way, if you rely on an express representation and it is significant, then it becomes part of the contract. Here is a guy who talks the talk, but fails to walk the walk. Why? Quite some time ago, I researched for gunsmiths who would apply TiN coatings and discovered Williamson. His price was relatively high, but he promised, in writing, a ten day turn around time. Yes, ten days. I hustled to get the piece to him over a weekend and he received it. Ten days evolved into months and made vague representations as to progress and precise location of the part. In fact, one might characterize his responses as evasive. Furthermore, he directed me not to bother him and that he did not work well under pressure. These statements were a stark contrast to his original representations. I will include an image reflecting communication and be certain to read it.

As a further note, I filed a Small Claims against him as well. Williamson defaulted and a judgment issued. Collection is another problem, but there is hope. First simple interest accrues. Second, the judgment attaches to credit. Consequently, Williamson will NEVER be able to get a loan of any kind until the judgment is satisfied. I am a lawyer, so I'm not blowing smoke on this issue.

Here is the Notice of Default Judgment including rationale by the Court.

Paul Klenk v. Michael Williamson DBA Williamson Guns Sales and Service

"This matter came on for a pre-trial conference . The plaintiff was present. The defendant did not appear or contact the court. Therefore , defendant is deemed to have defaulted. Plaintiff made an offer of proof as to the basis for his claim. The legal right to recover against the defendant is based on a service contract and the defendant's breach of the terms for time for performance. On the offer made, the court finds that the defendant did not perform until at least two months past the due date. As such, the court can reasonably infer at least minimal damages as a result of the defendant's brief of contract. The court finds that $75.00 in damages is a fair and reasonable amount under these circumstances .

Therefore , default judgment in favor of plaintiff in the amount of $75.00, plus court costs and statutory pre-judgment interest from the date of complaint until present is entered against the defendant." "